New Survey of More than 500 Creatives and Marketers Tells a Cautionary Tale as CMOs Take More Creative Work In-house

Feb 14, 2019

A new survey of 566 creative and marketing professionals finds that leaders in both camps scored marginal grades and points to a range of challenges in the organizational relationship, team alignment, and collaboration – which stem from the natural challenges that come with growing in-house creative teams. More importantly, an analysis of the data links these challenges to the effects they have on creative operations and efficiency, according to findings revealed in the 2019 In-House Creative Management Report.

While chief marketing officers (CMOs) have increasingly taken more creative work in-house—in pursuit of deep brand knowledge and efficiency—the survey reveals early warning indications that merely adding headcount isn’t enough. Marketing and creative departments need well-defined, mutually agreed upon, and highly collaborative processes to drive the benefits CMOs aim to deliver for the business.

The study shows that those creative and marketing organizations with strong alignment are more likely to give leaders higher marks, report good morale, use best practices, and have the capacity to dedicate more time doing what they were hired to do: being creative.

The survey was fielded by InSource, a non-profit professional organization for in-house creative teams, and inMotionNow, a leading provider of creative workflow solutions.  High-level findings from the study include the following:


  • Creative and marketing leaders receive marginal grades as creative teams suffer low morale. Just 64% of respondents said their creative leadership is effective and even less (54%) said their marketing leadership is effective. Less than half (45%) say morale on the creative team is high.
  • Creative and marketing shops in need of alignment.  Following years of growth, just 47% said the relationship between creative and marketing is better this year than last. Collaboration between marketing and creative didn’t fare much better with just 51% saying collaboration was effective.  An astonishing 79% of creatives said they receive feedback on the performance of creative assets just some of the time or not at all.  
  • The payoff for improving the relationship between creative and marketing.  Teams that report strong alignment are 18% more likely to say collaboration is effective; 16% more likely say their marketing leadership is effective, 12% more likely to report using best practices, 12% more likely to have high morale; and 11% more likely to say their creative leadership is effective. 
  • Volume and velocity are the top challenges facing creatives. The increased volume and short deadlines are the top challenges facing in-house creatives. This was followed by the creative desire to be considered strategic contributors rather than “mechanical artists” robotically banging out design, graphics, and creative content. A majority (72%) of respondents say “obtaining the necessary information just to get started on a project” is an administrative task that soaks up time that would be better spent doing creative work.
  • As teams grow, creatives are stuck spending more time on administrative tasks. Nearly half (48%) say they spend about one day a week or more on non-creative work – that’s up 14% from the same survey last year.  In addition, an astonishing one-fifth (22%) indicated they spend 10 hours a week or more chasing down information, feedback and approvals – that also ticked up 6% from last year’s survey. Conversely, those creatives that spend just four hours or less on admin tasks each week are more likely to report effective leadership, use of best practices and an ability to get creative assets into market producing results more efficiently.

Related Articles

Digital publishing company Exact Editions has renewed its ABC certification for the seventh time since 2012. ABC provides independently audited data for the UK media industry to use when trading print, digital and event advertising.