Digital Experience Is All About Integration and Agility


BEST PRACTICES SERIES

Article ImageDigital experience (DX) covers a lot of territory—so much so that discussions about DX technology often result in a consensus that collapses as projects surface incompatible expectations. Customer experience had a similar problem, getting way out of hand with expectations of omnichannel, including brick-and-mortar stores. If you’ve been around enterprise software for a while, you’ll be familiar with software category labels outgrowing their britches and acting like they can do anything, if you’ll forgive the anthropomorphizing. 

DX is not a single thing that you buy. It is a solution you build with unique collections of products for a specific audience. This is not a walk in the park, given the vast number of potentially relevant components. It can help to keep in mind a few universal laws of enterprise software and one very relevant piece of history. 

 

Universal Laws of Enterprise Software

• Software products never stop growing. Even if there were a cure for feature bloat, ongoing maintenance will add code.

Software categories—which are created by a combination of software marketers and industry analysts—grow, shrink, and get repurposed to meet the business needs of their creators and to accommodate new technologies and industry applications. 

• Software companies, like all businesses, need continuous growth. That means new products, expanded product capabilities—perhaps a suite—and, if possible, a platform play for a bigger piece of the pie.

Software needs to be integratable because enterprises have complex data and workflows that all involve software. 

• Software must be agile because even the best software engineers and product managers can’t anticipate all the ways customers will use the software and neither can their customers. 

 

A Lesson From the Past

Before the web juggernaut, progress had been made in building GUIs for business applications and managing and presenting digital content in increasingly friendly ways. But the solutions were mainly proprietary, which meant multiple user interface learning curves and complex and costly integrations. The web, with a much simplified and standardized markup language for content and a way to present it in a browser, soon became the dominant DX for both business and personal computing. The web experience was so simple that the audience for digital content increased dramatically. Brochure-ware and simple intranets blossomed. Then things got complicated. 

The promise of ecommerce and new business models fueled investment fever. But the integrations required between the web publishing and the back-end systems necessary to support web commerce (pricing databases, supply chain, logistics, etc.) didn’t exist. Early attempts to build them were custom, complex, and costly, and the results were fragile. The technical challenges were compounded by a lack of domain and integration expertise in dot-com startups and a lack of agility and organizational resistance in larger organizations. “Frictionless commerce” failed on the front end and back end, and the dot-com bubble burst.

 

DX Today

We have come a long way, but the pace of new technologies ensures that integration and agility will remain core challenges. DX is riding high today, and that is a good thing. DX is not a bubble. But that doesn’t mean there won’t be overly ambitious strategies, unsuccessful implementations, and weak products.  

• Don’t forget the laws of enterprise software or the lessons from the dot-com crash. 

• Note that integratablility and agility are as critical for operational efficiency as they are for a smooth DX. 

• DX is about audiences, not just about customers, employees, or partners; each of these can be made up of many audiences. 

• Scope for success. Ensure that your strategy includes achievable projects for well-defined audiences. You will be more successful and able to implement in less time by picking specific integrations that have high value, for example, CMS with customer relationship management or ecommerce. 

• Don’t limit DX technology research to a single analyst firm. They mostly cover the same vendors, but their analysis often differs significantly. 

• Be sure to develop enough in-house expertise to make well-informed decisions about the applicability and readiness of new technologies such as deep learning, augmented reality, and blockchain.


Related Articles

This year's EContent 100 list includes companies that are changing with the times and some that are leading the charge. Find out which 100 companies made this year's list of companies that Matter Most in the Digital Content Industry.
The assumption that organizations would buy a single-vendor DXP based on the number of parts within said solution is at odds with what our analysts and consultants were seeing across companies of all sizes and industry sectors. We decided that it was time for voice-of-the-buyer, fact-based insight that would separate DXP myths from reality.
Marketers have done well by pairing technological advancements with the best AI tools—such as personalization based on browsing history. This trend should continue with the new era of global chatbots. When companies move toward marketing by chat, they need to use this channel wisely or risk damaging their customer relationships. As technology advances, user expectations rise.
Discovery models (such as text search, voice search, visual search, chatbots, natural language search, and faceted search) may overlap in some areas of functionality, but also enhance different use cases and appeal to different types of users.
In the world of content, automation is having an effect on things such as image, speech, and text processing—and even the creation of written content. In the translation and localization sector, we're seeing automation driven by AI (such as neural machine translation) and by old-fashioned human ingenuity. Automation is used as a competitive advantage by translation companies since in most cases, it results in cost-savings and time-savings for their clients.
Any attempts to limit the public's access to information would undermine that purpose. Unfortunately, following several months of pervasive news stories regarding alleged Russian influence campaigns during the 2016 elections, major internet companies opted for censorship.